U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Gibson

United States v. Gibson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 24, 2009 · Agee, King, Per Curiam, Traxler
319 F. App'x 259

United States v. Gibson

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lewis Dean Gibson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gibson, No. 1:97-cr-00310-LHT-3 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.