U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Gibson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 24, 2009 · Agee, King, Per Curiam, Traxler

319 F. App'x 259

Counsel

Chiege O. Kalu Okwara, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Thomas Richard Ascik, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lewis Dean Gibson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gibson, No. 1:97-cr-00310-LHT-3 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.