United States v. Crute
United States v. Crute
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Robert Darin Crute appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Crute, No. 2:93-cr-00092-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 2, 2008 & Aug. 8, 2008). We dispense with oral ar *240 gument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately addressed in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.