U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Bennett

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 24, 2009 · Agee, King, Per Curiam, Traxler

319 F. App'x 262

Counsel

Carl Edward Bennett, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Todd Hagins, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carl Edward Bennett appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Bennett, No. 0:04-cr-00657-JFA-2 (D.S.C. Nov. 21, 2008). We dispense with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately addressed in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.