United States v. Thurman
United States v. Thurman
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8380
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROBERT ANDREW THURMAN, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (4:96-cr-00020-LHT-1; 4:98-cr-00089-LHT-1)
Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 23, 2009
Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Andrew Thurman, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Robert Andrew Thurman appeals the district court's order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Thurman, Nos. 4:96-cr-00020-LHT-1; 4:98-cr-00089-LHT-1 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.