U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Frye

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 3, 2009 · Motz, Per Curiam, Shedd, Traxler

320 F. App'x 164

Counsel

James Preston Frye, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Ronald Hood, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Preston Frye appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Frye, No. 3:01-cr-00167-JRS-1 (E.D.Va. Apr. 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.