U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Frye

United States v. Frye
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 3, 2009 · Motz, Per Curiam, Shedd, Traxler
320 F. App'x 164

United States v. Frye

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Preston Frye appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Frye, No. 3:01-cr-00167-JRS-1 (E.D.Va. Apr. 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.