U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Meadows

United States v. Meadows
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 8, 2009 · Wilkinson, King, Hamilton
320 F. App'x 189

United States v. Meadows

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*190 PER CURIAM:

Willie Meadows appeals from the district court’s order denying him a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Meadows, No. 7:03-cr-01094-HFF-13 (D.S.C. June 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.