U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Hudson

United States v. Hudson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 7, 2009 · Wilkinson, Niemeyer, Michael
320 F. App'x 184

United States v. Hudson

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Howard Hudson timely appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and motion to supplement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Hudson, No. 2:99-cr-00048-1 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.