U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Hudson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 7, 2009 · Wilkinson, Niemeyer, Michael

320 F. App'x 184

Counsel

Michael T. Clifford, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. J. Patrick Rowan, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Mul-laney, John W. Van Lonkhuyzen, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Howard Hudson timely appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and motion to supplement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Hudson, No. 2:99-cr-00048-1 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.