Boysaw v. Friedman
Boysaw v. Friedman
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2184
DONALD M. BOYSAW, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL FRIEDMAN; HOWARD R. UDELL; PAUL GOLDENHEIM, Defendants – Appellees, and PURDUE PHARMA, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (1:07-cv-00079-jpj-pms)
Submitted: March 26, 2009 Decided: April 6, 2009
Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald M. Boysaw, Appellant Pro Se. Cameron Scott Bell, William W. Eskridge, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Donald M. Boysaw appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Boysaw v. Friedman, No. 1:07-cv-00079-jpj-pms (W.D. Va. Sept. 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.