U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Howard

United States v. Howard
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 23, 2009

United States v. Howard

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6478

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. KENNITA HOWARD, a/k/a Eyez, Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:06-cr-00106-IMK-JSK-1)

Submitted: April 17, 2009 Decided: April 23, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kennita Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Shawn Angus Morgan, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Kennita Howard appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Howard, No. 1:06-cr- 00106-IMK-JSK-1 (N.D. W. Va. Mar. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.