United States v. Bacon
United States v. Bacon
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7907
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BRIAN BACON, a/k/a Brian Hillard, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:95-cr-00028-jct-1)
Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: April 30, 2009
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian Bacon, Appellant Pro Se. Ray Burton Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Ronald Mitchell Huber, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia; Anthony Paul Giorno, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Brian Bacon appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bacon, No. 7:95-cr-00028-jct-1 (W.D. Va. Apr. 9, 2008; Aug. 19, 2008); see United States v. Lindsey, 556 F.3d 238, 243- (4th Cir. 2009); United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 251 (4th Cir. 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.