U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Adams

United States v. Adams
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 27, 2009

United States v. Adams

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6007

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JOHNNY RAY ADAMS, Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:96-cr-00132-F-1)

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 27, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny Ray Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Johnny Ray Adams appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Hood, __ F.3d __, 2009 WL 416979 (4th Cir. 2009).

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Adams, No. 5:96-cr-00132-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.