U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Coleman

United States v. Coleman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 8, 2009

United States v. Coleman

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MARTEZ MANDEL COLEMAN, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:01-cr-00506-JFA-4)

Submitted: April 17, 2009 Decided: May 8, 2009

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Martez Mandel Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, Mark C. Moore, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Martez Mandel Coleman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Coleman, No. 3:01-cr-00506-JFA-4 (D.S.C. Dec. 15, 2008); see also United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir. 2009), petition for cert. filed (Mar. 20, 2009) (No. 08-1185). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.