U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Claiborne

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 5, 2009 · Michael, Gregory, Duncan

325 F. App'x 164

Counsel

Carolyn Virginia Grady, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Angela Mastandrea-Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Dana J. Claiborne appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Claiborne, No. 3:06-cr-00240-RLW-1 (E.D.Va. Dec. 22, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten *165 tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.