U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Campbell

United States v. Campbell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 19, 2009

United States v. Campbell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6044

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WALTER LOMAX CAMPBELL, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (6:06-cr-00812-HMH-1)

Submitted: April 29, 2009 Decided: May 19, 2009

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter Lomax Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Walter Lomax Campbell appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Campbell, No. 6:06-cr- 00812-HMH-1 (D.S.C. Dec. 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.