U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Barbour v. Western Regional Director

Barbour v. Western Regional Director
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 19, 2009

Barbour v. Western Regional Director

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8544

KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. WESTERN REGIONAL DIRECTOR, Virginia Department of Corrections; WARDEN, W.R.S.P; B. J. RAVIZEE; M. SHORT, Lieutenant; BRYAN WATSON; LIEUTENANT BUGIN; S. COLLINS, Correctional Officer; MAJOR COMBS; DOCTOR LEE; R. M.

GARNERT; M. STANFORD, R.N.; R. BIVENS, Regional Ombudsman, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:08-cv-00598-JCT-MFU)

Submitted: April 29, 2009 Decided: May 19, 2009

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Edward Barbour, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Kenneth Edward Barbour appeals the district court’s order consolidating his eight 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints and dismissing them without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Barbour v. Western Reg’l Dir., No. 7:08-cv-00598-JCT-MFU (W.D. Va. Nov. 26, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.