U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Jacobs

United States v. Jacobs
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 29, 2009 · Motz, Traxler, Agee
326 F. App'x 228

Counsel

Mark Anthony Jacobs, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

United States v. Jacobs

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mark Anthony Jacobs appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jacobs, No. 2:97-er-00136-WLO-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 12, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.