U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Berry v. Porterfield

Berry v. Porterfield
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 27, 2009

Berry v. Porterfield

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8571

WILLIE LEE BERRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. M. TIMOTHY PORTERFIELD, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:01-cv-00627-GCM)

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 27, 2009

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Lee Berry, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Willie Lee Berry appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of its previous order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Berry v. Porterfield, No. 3:01-cv-00627-GCM (W.D.N.C. Dec. 4, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.