Darryl L. Moffett appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Moffett argues that the district court erred by failing to reduce his sentence under Amendment 706 of the Guidelines, see U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“USSG”) § 2Dl.l(c) (2008); USSG App. C, Amend. 706. We have reviewed the record and find the district court properly exercised its discretion after considering the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2006) factors. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.