U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Burdick v. Pritchett & Birch, PLLC

Burdick v. Pritchett & Birch, PLLC
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 5, 2009

Burdick v. Pritchett & Birch, PLLC

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1216

GEORGE E. BURDICK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PRITCHETT & BIRCH, PLLC; LLOYD C. SMITH, JR.; REGINA PARKER; SAMUEL GRIMES; CHRISTOPHER B. MCLENDON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (4:08-cv-00053-BO)

Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 5, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George E. Burdick, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Graham Baker, BAKER, JENKINS, JONES & DALY, PA, Ahoskie, North Carolina, Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: George E. Burdick appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss his civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burdick v. Pritchett & Birch, PLLC, No. 4:08-cv-00053-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 2008; Jan. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.