United States v. Wiggins
United States v. Wiggins
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8520
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. DONNELL SEAN WIGGINS, Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:06-cr-00034-JBF-JEB-1)
Submitted: April 6, 2009 Decided: June 3, 2009
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donnell Sean Wiggins, Appellant Pro Se. James Ashford Metcalfe, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Donnell Sean Wiggins appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of its order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Wiggins, No. 2:06- cr-00034-JBF-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 7, 2008; Oct. 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.