Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Terrance Bradley Thompson appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying his amended motion for reconsideration. Thompson argues that the district court *239 erred by failing to reduce his sentence based on Amendment 706 of the Guidelines. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“USSG”) § 201.1(c) (2007 & Supp. 2008); USSG App. C Amend. 706. As we recently observed, “Amendment 706 ... amended § 2D1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines by reducing the offense levels associated with crack cocaine quantities by two levels.” United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226, 232 (4th Cir. 2009). “Because [Thompson’s] 240-month Guidelines sentence was based on a statutory minimum and USSG § 5Gl.l(b), it was not based on a sentencing range lowered by Amendment 706 ....” Id. at 233. The fact that the district court reduced Thompson’s sentence for substantial assistance under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) (2006) and Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 is irrelevant to the applicability of Amendment 706. Hood, 556 F.3d at 234. Accordingly, we deny Thompson’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the decision of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.