U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Jordan v. Prince William County

Jordan v. Prince William County
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 3, 2009 · Michael, Traxler, Duncan
326 F. App'x 243

Counsel

Alan S. Shachter, Manassas, Virginia, for Appellant. Ross G. Horton, County Attorney, Megan E. Kelly, Assistant County Attorney, Prince William, Virginia, for Appellee.

Jordan v. Prince William County

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rock Jordan appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the County of Prince William, Virginia, and denying summary judgment to Jordan on Jordan’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint alleging due process viqlations in conjunction with his termination from employment with the County of Prince William.

Finding the County’s pre-termination and post-termination hearing procedures satisfied due process requirements in light of Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 105 S.Ct. 1487, 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985), and Linton v. Frederick County Bd. of County Comm’rs, 964 F.2d 1436 (4th Cir. 1992), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jordan v. Prince William County, Virginia, No. 1:08-cv-00089-LO-TRJ (E.D.Va. July 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.