U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Shelton v. United States Post Office

Shelton v. United States Post Office
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 2, 2009

Shelton v. United States Post Office

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2349

JOHN B. SHELTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POST OFFICE; EMPLOYEE ONE/JOHN DOE I; EMPLOYEE TWO/JOHN DOE II, Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:08-cv-00399-JRS)

Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 2, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John B. Shelton, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: John B. Shelton appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shelton v. United States Post Office, No. 3:08-cv-00399-JRS (E.D. Va. Oct. 17, 2008 & Oct. 30, 2008).

We deny as moot Shelton’s motion for a ten-day stay of this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.