U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Salazar

United States v. Salazar
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 1, 2009 · King, Shedd, Duncan
326 F. App'x 129

United States v. Salazar

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Martin F. Salazar appeals the district court’s order denying his pro se motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Salazar, No. 1:06-cr-00123-MBS-1 (D.S.C. Nov. 11, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.