U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Salazar

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 1, 2009 · King, Shedd, Duncan

326 F. App'x 129

Counsel

Martin F. Salazar, Appellant pro se. Dean A. Eichelberger, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Martin F. Salazar appeals the district court’s order denying his pro se motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Salazar, No. 1:06-cr-00123-MBS-1 (D.S.C. Nov. 11, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.