U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Downey v. Johnson

Downey v. Johnson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 1, 2009

Downey v. Johnson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6261

BENJAMIN ROSS DOWNEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GENE JOHNSON; HELEN F. FAHEY; JAMES SISK, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (3:08-cv-00199-REP)

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: June 1, 2009

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin Ross Downey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Benjamin Ross Downey appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil rights action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Downey v. Johnson, No. 3:08-cv-00199-REP (E.D. Va. Jan. 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.