U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Wilder v. Chertoff

Wilder v. Chertoff
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 10, 2009 · Motz, King, Duncan
326 F. App'x 187

Wilder v. Chertoff

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Federal Tort Claims Act complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilder v. Chertoff, No. 1:07-cv-02541-BEL (D.Md. Aug. 14, 2008). Wilder’s motions for appointment of counsel and for rehearing and rehearing en banc are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the *188 materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.