U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Blake

United States v. Blake
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 9, 2009

United States v. Blake

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7104

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WARREN ANDREW BLAKE, JR., Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:04-cr-00124-jct-1)

Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 9, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fay Frances Spence, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Warren Andrew Blake, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Blake, No. 7:04-cr-00124-jct-1 (W.D. Va. June 25, 2008). See United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir. 2009).

We deny Blake’s motion to consolidate and appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.