U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Hester v. Astrue

Hester v. Astrue
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 9, 2009

Hester v. Astrue

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2150

VANCE DONNELL HESTER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (7:07-cv-00125-D)

Submitted: April 17, 2009 Decided: June 9, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Clifton Hester, HESTER GRADY & HESTER, P.L.L.C, Elizabethtown, North Carolina, for Appellant. George E. B.

Holding, United States Attorney, Karen J. Aviles, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Vance Donnell Hester appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for judgment on the pleadings and granting the Commissioner’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in his action seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision to deny him disability insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income under the Social Security Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, Hester v. Astrue, No. 7:07-cv-00125-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2008), and our decision in Mickles v. Shalala, 29 F.3d 918 (4th Cir. 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.