United States v. Wilson
United States v. Wilson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6107
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RICHARD EARL WILSON, JR., a/k/a Robert Wilson, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:95-cr-00049-RBS-10)
Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 8, 2009
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Earl Wilson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Richard Wilson, Jr., appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wilson, No. 2:95-cr- 00049-RBS-10 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 28, entered Oct. 30, 2008; filed Dec. 1, entered Dec. 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.