U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

In Re: Young v.

In Re: Young v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 8, 2009

In Re: Young v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2135

In Re: LARRY ARNOLD YOUNG, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:88-cr-00112-1; 1:06-cv-00347)

Submitted: March 13, 2009 Decided: June 8, 2009

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Arnold Young, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Larry Arnold Young petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2008) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.