U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

LaRoque v. Beck

LaRoque v. Beck
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 25, 2009

LaRoque v. Beck

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6588

GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. THEODIS BECK; JAMES E. LANGSTON; THEODORE WALKER; HEIDI GALETSCHRY, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:09-ct-03025-H)

Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 25, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Paul LaRoque, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: George Paul LaRoque appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. LaRoque v. Beck, No. 5:09-ct-03025-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.