McKinnedy v. Reynolds
McKinnedy v. Reynolds
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
William Clayton McKinnedy, III, seeks to appeal two orders: (1) the magistrate judge’s order denying McKinnedy’s motion for reconsideration of an earlier order denying his motion for recusal and (2) the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing without prejudice McKinnedy’s claims against some but not all defendants. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders McKinnedy seeks to appeal are neither final orders *701 nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.