United States v. Gee
United States v. Gee
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8381
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. RICKY GEE, Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:03-cr-00394-JRS-11)
Submitted: April 29, 2009 Decided: July 2, 2009
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricky Gee, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Ricky Gee appeals the district court’s order granting in part his motion for sentence modification under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant the Government’s motion to seal its informal response brief and affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Gee, No. 3:03-cr-00394-JRS-11 (E.D. Va. Oct. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.