U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Washington

United States v. Washington
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 1, 2009
328 F. App'x 163

United States v. Washington

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6584

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. MARIO FANEAK WASHINGTON, Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:04-cr-00063-LHT-1)

Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: July 1, 2009

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mario Faneak Washington, Appellant Pro Se. David Kenneth Davis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Mario Faneak Washington appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Washington, No. 1:04-cr-00063- LHT-1 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.