U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Harrison v. Oakley

Harrison v. Oakley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 9, 2009

Harrison v. Oakley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7240

MICHAEL HARRISON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SCOTT OAKLEY, IGO; JOHN A. ROWLEY, Commissioner; VICTORIA BURKHARD, Assistant Commissioner; PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INCORPORATED; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED; RAZAAK ENIOLA, M.D.; LYNN COLE, Regional Manager; DOCTOR MATHIS, Defendants – Appellees, and JOHN DOE, Regional Manager; JOHN DOE, Previous Site Administrator, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:07-cv-02468-RDB)

Submitted: June 17, 2009 Decided: July 9, 2009

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. Phillip M. Pickus, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Lisa J. Russell, Larry Michael Waranch, WARANCH & BROWN, LLC, Lutherville, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, Katrina J. Dennis, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Michael Harrison appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harrison v. Oakley, No. 1:07-cv-02468-RDB (D. Md. June 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.