U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Michael

United States v. Michael
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 5, 2009

United States v. Michael

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6437

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KELLY DENISE MICHAEL, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:06-cr-00227-LHT-2)

Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 5, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kelly Denise Michael, Appellant Pro Se. Corey F. Ellis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Kelly Denise Michael appeals the district court’s order denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Michael, No. 1:06-cr-00227-LHT-2 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.