U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Stanback

United States v. Stanback
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 3, 2009

United States v. Stanback

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7631

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KELLY GEORGE STANBACK, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:02-cr-30020-sgw-1)

Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 3, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kelly George Stanback, Appellant Pro Se. Jeb Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Kelly George Stanback appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for an extension of time to file a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Stanback, No. 5:02-cr-30020-sgw-1 (W.D. Va. July 24, 2008). We deny Stanback’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.