Peltier v. Metts
Peltier v. Metts
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1173
BRIAN E. PELTIER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOBE C. METTS, MD; MUSC; TENET SOUTH CAROLINA, d/b/a East Cooper Regional Medical Center; UNIVERSITY MEDICAL ASSOCIATES; J. C. NICHOLSON, JR., Circuit Court Judge State of SC; FLORIDA MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT, INCORPORATED; SANDRA J.
SENN; ROBIN L. JACKSON; THE LAW FIRM OF SANDRA J. SENN; ROBERT H. HOOD, JR.; HOOD LAW FIRM, LLC; LINDSAY K. SMITH- YANCEY; DOUGLAS PRATT-THOMAS; THE LAW FIRM OF PRATT-THOMAS WALKER; HUGH W. BUYCK; DARREN K. SANDERS; ALL DEFENDANTS INSURANCE COMPANIES, tbd at discovery phase of this trial; THOMAS E. KEENE, MD; RHONDA RICHARDSON, MUSC affiliation; SOUTH CAROLINA BUDGET AND CONTROL BOARD, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00044-DCN)
Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 3, 2009
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian E. Peltier, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Brian E. Peltier appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Peltier v. Metts, No. 2:09-cv-00044-DCN (D.S.C. Jan. 28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.