U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

In Re: Jackson v.

In Re: Jackson v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 3, 2009

In Re: Jackson v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1079

In Re: CECIL EDWARD JACKSON, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:90-cr-00085-RLV)

Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 3, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cecil Edward Jackson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Cecil Edward Jackson petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court ruled on the motion by order entered on January 22, 2009. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.