U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Jackson

United States v. Jackson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 12, 2009

United States v. Jackson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6685

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v.

ADRIAN Y. JACKSON, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-6686

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v.

ADRIAN Y. JACKSON, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:04-cr-00191-MR-DCK-5; 3:05-cr-00103-RJC-DCK- 1)

Submitted: August 5, 2009 Decided: August 12, 2009 Before MICHAEL, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Cary Fialko, RUDOLF, WIDENHOUSE & FIALKO, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Adrian Y. Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jackson, Nos. 3:04-cr-00191-MR-DCK-5; 3:05-cr-00103- RJC-DCK-1 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.