Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Sharon L. Saunders petitions for review of orders of the Benefits Review Board (Board) dismissing her appeal from a compensation award as untimely and denying her motion for reconsideration. We affirm.

Saunders was required to appeal the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) within thirty days after the decision (1) was filed in the office of the Deputy Commissioner and (2) was served on her. See 33 U.S.C. §§ 919(e), 921(a) (2006); Dominion Coal Corp. v. Honaker, 33 F.3d 401, 403 (4th Cir. 1994). The thirty-day period is jurisdictional. Grant v. Director, *891 OWCP, 502 F.3d 361, 364 (5th Cir. 2007). Here, the ALJ’s decision was filed with the Deputy Commissioner and served on Saunders on March 3, 2008. Saunders had thirty days, or until April 2, 2008, to note her appeal. Her notice of appeal, dated April 3, 2008, was untimely, as the Board found.

We therefore affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.