Versatile v. Wright
Versatile v. Wright
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6505
LORD VERSATILE, a/k/a Venson Coward, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. E.E. WRIGHT, JR., Chief Warden, Defendant – Appellee, and RUFUS FLEMING, Eastern Regional Director; J.K. VAUGHAN, Inmate Hearing Officer; TRACY S. RAY, Chief Warden; RONALD T. COKER, Department of Corrections Liaison, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:05-cv-00768-RLW)
Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lord Versatile, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Larry Fitzgerald, James R. Morgan, Jr., Robert T. Numbers, II, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, William Michael Holm, WILLIAMS MULLEN, McLean, Virginia, James Bennett Kinsel, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Lord Versatile appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Versatile v. Wright, No. 3:05-cv-00768-RLW (E.D. Va. Feb. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.