Dula v. National Security Agency
Dula v. National Security Agency
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2352
GARY DUEY DULA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY; ITT CORPORATION; NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:08-cv-00427-DKC)
Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 24, 2009
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary Duey Dula, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Patrick Grady, Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore, Maryland; Adam Harrison Garner, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Aniya M. Dunkley, Charys Scotton Williams, MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Gary Duey Dula appeals the district court’s order dismissing Dula’s complaint and denying him injunctive and mandamus relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dula v. Nat’l Sec. Agency, No. 8:08-cv- 00427-DKC (D. Md. Nov. 4, 2008). We deny Dula’s motions for mandamus and general relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.