In Re: Moody v.
In Re: Moody v.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1074
In Re: HARRY NOLAN MOODY, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:07-cv-00127-LHT)
Submitted: August 27, 2009 Decided: September 4, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harry Nolan Moody, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Harry Moody petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255
Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Moody’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.