Coleman v. Maryland Parole Commission
Coleman v. Maryland Parole Commission
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6739
LEON COLEMAN, a/k/a Mr., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION; COMMISSIONER C. BEIKERT; T.
HOWELL, #23; COMMISSIONER PATTERSON; ALL PAROLE AGENTS, PAROLE ASSOCIATES, NAMES UNKNOWN, Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge. (1:09-cv-00749-BEL)
Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 3, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leon Coleman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Leon Coleman appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Coleman v. Maryland Parole Comm’n, No. 1:09-cv-00749-BEL (D. Md. April 9, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.