U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Sledd

United States v. Sledd
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 2, 2009

United States v. Sledd

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6656

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOSHUA T. SLEDD, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (5:04-cr-30016-gec-5)

Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 2, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joshua T. Sledd, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Joshua T. Sledd appeals the district court’s order denying his § 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Therefore we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sledd, No. 5:04-cr-30016-gec-5 (W.D. Va. March 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.