U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Bellamy

United States v. Bellamy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 2, 2009

United States v. Bellamy

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6518

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAMES FITZGERALD BELLAMY, a/k/a Gerald Bellamy, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L.

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:99-cr-00071-RLV-1)

Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 2, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Fitzgerald Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: James Fitzgerald Bellamy appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Bellamy, No. 5:99-cr-00071-RLV-1 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 17, 2009). We deny Bellamy’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.