U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Jack v. Stubblefield

Jack v. Stubblefield
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 9, 2009

Jack v. Stubblefield

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1758

TODD M. JACK, M.S., Ph.D., Trustee, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. WILLIAM STUBBLEFIELD, Ph.D., County Commissioner of Berkeley County, Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (5:09-cv-00046-gec)

Submitted: August 28, 2009 Decided: September 9, 2009

Before MICHAEL and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Todd M. Jack, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Todd M. Jack appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (ii) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jack v. Stubblefield, No. 5:09-cv-00046-gec (W.D. Va. filed June 22, entered June 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.