U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Johnson v. KMart Corporation

Johnson v. KMart Corporation
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 16, 2009

Johnson v. KMart Corporation

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2174

BEULAH JOHNSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. KMART CORPORATION; BOBBY HAMILTON, Individually, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:07-cv-00084-BR)

Submitted: September 1, 2009 Decided: September 16, 2009

Before KING, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas B. Kobrin, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant.

Kevin S. Joyner, Robert A. Sar, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Beulah Johnson appeals the district court's order granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion on her claims alleging employment discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006) (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 (2006), as well as her Title VII retaliation and state tort claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Johnson v. KMart Corp., No. 5:07-cv- 00084-BR (E.D.N.C. Sept. 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.