United States v. Hopkins
United States v. Hopkins
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6861
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. DALTON DION HOPKINS, Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:01-cr-00002-FDW-2)
Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 15, 2009
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dalton Dion Hopkins, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Dalton Dion Hopkins appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for sentence modification. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Hopkins, No. 3:01-cr-00002-FDW-2 (W.D.N.C. April 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.